Inside the Disturbing Alleged Bond Between Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein
Of course this happened. You’re scrolling at 2 a.m., nursing a lukewarm cup of coffee and wondering how humanity hasn’t imploded yet, and then—boom—another tale of power, perversity, and people who should absolutely know better. This time, it’s Prince Andrew and Jeffrey Epstein, two names that already carry enough baggage to fill an airport carousel twice over. And according to author Andrew Lownie’s new book, *Entitled: The Rise and Fall of the House of York*, their connection wasn’t just casual—it was built on the twin pillars of money and sex.
Let’s not pretend we’re shocked. Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died in a New York jail cell under suspicious circumstances, and Andrew, the disgraced Duke of York who’s been politically neutered since his infamous *BBC Newsnight* interview in 2019, were allegedly in cahoots far earlier than previously thought. Lownie claims their relationship began as early as 1991, not the early 2000s as many believed. That’s a full decade before Epstein’s crimes became public knowledge. A decade during which Andrew, as the UK’s special trade envoy, could have offered Epstein access, legitimacy, and connections that only a royal can provide.
And what did Epstein offer in return? According to Lownie, a “ready supply of women,” financial support for Andrew’s ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, and—perhaps most disturbingly—shared kinks. In a particularly stomach-turning quote from the book, Epstein allegedly said of Andrew: “We are both serial sex addicts… We have shared the same women. From the reports I’ve got back from them, he’s the most perverted animal in the bedroom. He likes to engage in stuff that’s even kinky to me – and I’m the king of kink!”
Meanwhile, Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former girlfriend and convicted accomplice, insists she never introduced Andrew to Epstein in the ’90s. But her version of events doesn’t exactly clear the air. In interviews released by the Department of Justice, Maxwell said she was friendly with Andrew and Sarah Ferguson but denied facilitating their meeting. Of course, her credibility is about as solid as a Jenga tower in an earthquake, so take that with a grain of salt.
What’s clear is that this was a mutually beneficial—and deeply troubling—friendship. Epstein got a royal stamp of approval, which likely opened doors in elite circles. Andrew, meanwhile, got Epstein’s money, his connections, and, allegedly, access to a network of vulnerable women. It’s a transactional relationship wrapped in the velvet glove of British aristocracy and American financial power.
And yet, despite the wealth of allegations, we may never know the full extent of what went on. Epstein is dead. Accuser Virginia Giuffre is dead. Maxwell is in prison. And the people who might know the most—those close to Andrew or Epstein at the time—are either silent or legally muzzled. Lownie insists there are people willing to talk, but unless legal documents are unsealed or witnesses decide to spill the tea, the truth remains buried under layers of privilege, secrecy, and non-disclosure agreements.
So here we are, another day, another reason to question the systems that allow people like Andrew and Epstein to thrive for so long. It’s not just about one bad apple—it’s about the entire orchard rotting from the inside out. And if you think this is the last we’ll hear of this saga, well, you’re either very naïve or very tired. Either way, buckle up.
Anyway, can’t wait to see how this gets worse.
Sources: Celebrity Storm and Fox News Digital, BBC, New York Post
Generated by AI
