x
Celebrity Storm
Close
Opinion and Analysis

Diddy Trial Enters Final Act: Closing Arguments Schedule Set

Diddy Trial Enters Final Act: Closing Arguments Schedule Set
  • PublishedJune 25, 2025

Objective analysis, evidence-driven reporting—let’s unpack the precise timetable for closing arguments as Sean “Diddy” Combs’ federal criminal trial moves into its home stretch. Courtroom proceedings Wednesday laid the groundwork for a two-day finale, with prosecutors locked in a four-hour closing push beginning tomorrow and the defense lining up for their rebuttal on Friday.

Federal attorneys secured permission to open at 10 a.m. ET on Thursday. They’ll present two hours of argument, adjourn for a lunch recess, then return for another two-hour segment. This structured approach mirrors the prosecution’s intent to maintain juror focus and systematically recap testimony spanning weeks of witness statements, exhibits and cross-examination. Assistant U.S. Attorney Christy Slavik—stepping in for the high-profile Maurene Comey—is slated to lead Thursday’s presentation, underscoring the Justice Department’s confidence in her case management and closing technique.

Following the government’s wrap-up, co-lead defense counsel Marc Agnifilo will take the podium Friday for an estimated three-hour counterargument. Agnifilo is expected to emphasize reasonable doubt, strategic inconsistencies in witness accounts and constitutional safeguards protecting Combs. Once the defense rests its case, prosecutors have reserved up to one hour for a rebuttal, aiming to rebut any residual defense claims and sharpen the narrative before jury deliberations kick off.

Several logistical factors now enter the equation. Judge Robert Reed raised concerns about the looming July 4 holiday, which could interrupt jury deliberations and complicate an already tight calendar. If closing arguments spill over into late Friday, jurors might not receive instructions until the next court session Monday, potentially extending the timeline by a day or more. Such delays can influence juror recollection and courtroom momentum—an analytical point worth noting as momentum shifts often sway high-stakes verdicts.

The atmosphere inside the small Brooklyn courtroom remained subdued on Wednesday, with Combs noticeably listening through a single AirPod and rarely making eye contact. His sons, Quincy and Justin, sat side-by-side, battling afternoon drowsiness as attorneys negotiated procedural minutiae off the record. Despite its unglamorous appearance, these behind-the-scenes scheduling sessions are critical: they dictate how jurors consume final arguments and, ultimately, how they deliberate.

As we edge closer to the verdict phase, the timing and structure of these closing statements may prove as consequential as the evidence itself. Prosecutors’ decision to split their presentation around a lunch break could signal an effort to keep jurors engaged, while the defense’s concentrated Friday push might rally support for Combs’ contention of innocence. Stay informed, stay critical, and follow the facts—more updates will follow as this high-profile trial reaches its culmination.

Sources: Celebrity Storm and TMZ, U.S. District Court filings
Attribution: Creative Commons Licensed

Written By
Zoe Bennett

Zoe Bennett is a sharp and ambitious journalist with a passion for uncovering the truth behind the headlines. With a keen eye for detail and a knack for storytelling, Zoe brings fresh perspectives to celebrity news, combining serious reporting with a lighthearted touch. Known for her engaging writing style, she cuts through the noise to deliver the most interesting—and often surprising—insights. When she’s not covering the latest celebrity buzz, Zoe enjoys vintage shopping, experimenting with new recipes, and binge-watching classic films. She’s always on the lookout for the next big story and isn’t afraid to dig deep.