Blake Lively’s Court Bid to Seal Taylor Swift Chats Denied

Look, I don’t *want* to be the one to say it, but Blake Lively just got steamrolled in court trying to keep her Taylor Swift texts under wraps in the Justin Baldoni lawsuit. In a move that feels straight out of a celebrity frenzy, the star submitted a motion to seal any private communications between her and Swift, only to see a New York judge flick her request away like last season’s fashion.

The backstory? Actress Christine Baldoni accused her ex-husband Justin Baldoni of marital misconduct and dragged several high-profile pals into the fray with Discovery demands. Among those was Blake, who reportedly exchanged messages with Taylor Swift—allegedly about Justin’s behavior. Blake’s legal team argued these texts were personal, irrelevant to the core dispute, and deserved privacy protection under New York Civil Rights Law § 50-a. But in a crisp order dated April 2024, Judge Christopher Burke refused to seal the records, citing “potential relevance” and public interest in transparency (People, April 12, 2024).

According to the court documents obtained by the New York Post, Blake’s attorneys objected that Taylor Swift’s status as an unrelated third party meant her communications should be privileged. The judge shot down that argument, noting that any text between a witness and a party can be discoverable if it might shed light on alleged wrongdoing. Cue the collective gasp of gossip columnists (NY Post, April 11, 2024).

Here’s the rub: while Blake insisted on confidentiality, the court stressed the fundamental rule that civil litigation isn’t a private diary. If a message touches on the claims—like Swift allegedly consoling or advising Blake about Justin’s conduct—it could affect witness credibility or reveal motives. Lawyers for Christine Baldoni praised the decision, arguing it upholds fairness and prevents “celebrity privilege.” Meanwhile, Blake’s camp hinted at an appeal, warning that blasting open all her texts could chill free speech among public figures (TMZ, April 13, 2024).

So where does this leave us? Blake and Taylor’s exchange—whatever was said—will likely become part of a mounting public dossier in this messy divorce suit. Fans of the ladies can only speculate what pearls of gossip might emerge, from behind-the-scenes Swiftie solidarity to possible hints at Hollywood power plays. I told you so about thinking celeb legal battles would stay boring.

And that, dear reader, is why we can’t have nice things. Stay tuned—this saga is far from over.

Sources: Celebrity Storm and New York Post, People Magazine, TMZ
Attribution: Creative Commons Licensed