Mark Geragos Slams D.A. Hochman Over Menendez Case Missteps
In a fiery exchange that could have been plucked straight from a courtroom drama, attorney Mark Geragos has laid into Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman regarding his handling of the Menendez brothers’ case. Geragos, who represents Erik and Lyle Menendez in their quest for freedom after three decades of incarceration, didn’t hold back during an appearance on “TMZ Live.” He accused Hochman of being woefully uninformed about the case and its nuances, essentially declaring that the D.A. needs to hit the books if he plans to engage meaningfully in this high-stakes legal saga.
Geragos’s criticisms stem from Hochman’s recent press conference, where the D.A. spent over 45 minutes reiterating long-debunked prosecution narratives from the 1990s. Notably, Hochman insisted that the Menendez brothers still needed to admit to their past lies, despite the fact that these admissions were already made during their original trial—something Geragos pointed out emphatically. The attorney argued that Hochman’s insistence on these points indicated a lack of familiarity with trial transcripts and an inability to grasp the complexities of resentencing law, particularly in light of California Governor Gavin Newsom’s recent interventions in the case.
Hochman’s press conference, according to Geragos, was not only misguided but also a form of political grandstanding, possibly setting the stage for Hochman’s own aspirations in the political arena. The D.A.’s discourse was rendered moot when Governor Newsom ordered a risk assessment for the Menendez brothers, a move that effectively bypasses the resentencing hearing Hochman was so keen to discuss. This assessment could lead to a parole board review, further complicating Hochman’s position.
With the Menendez brothers’ case now under new scrutiny, Geragos’s palpable frustration reflects a broader concern that legal proceedings may be overshadowed by political maneuvering. As the legal drama unfolds, one can’t help but wonder: Is this a case of justice being sidelined by ambition? The implications of Hochman’s words may resonate beyond the courtroom, sparking debates about the intersection of law and politics in high-profile cases.
Sources: Celebrity Storm and People Magazine, The Hollywood Reporter
Image Credit: Title: Untitled, Author: No author info, License: [‘cc_attribute’, ‘cc_nonderived’, ‘cc_publicdomain’]
